Skin appearance

Split-face LED phototherapy (830 nm and 633 nm) for facial wrinkles

Lee et al. · 2007 · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B

Lee SY, Park KH, Choi JW, et al. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, and split-face clinical study on LED phototherapy for skin rejuvenation. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2007;88(1):51-67.

Source & abstract

What they found

Eight split-face LED sessions over four weeks produced up to a 36% reduction in wrinkles and up to a 19% increase in elasticity on treated sides, with histological increases in collagen and elastic fibers. The combined 830+633 nm arm performed best.

Evidence grade

moderate

Effect direction

positive

Panel relevance

panel replicable

Key outcomes

  • Up to 36% reduction in wrinkles (objective profilometry)
  • Up to 19% increase in skin elasticity
  • Increased collagen and elastic fibers on histology
  • Combined 830 nm + 633 nm outperformed either wavelength alone

Protocol details

DeviceQuasi-monochromatic LED arrays
Wavelengths633, 830 nm
IrradianceNot reported
Dose (fluence)Not reported
Session timeNot reported
Frequency2x per week
Sessions / course8 sessions
Study length4 weeks (8 sessions)
Treatment areaHalf-face (split-face design)
Study size76 subjects; four arms (830 nm, 633 nm, 830+633 nm, sham); split-face (treated vs untreated half)

Caveats

  • Per-session irradiance and fluence are not clearly or consistently reported, and some secondary reviews appear to confuse this study's doses with other Omnilux trials - so we list its dose as unreported rather than guess.
  • Short four-week course; durability beyond the study window was not assessed.
  • Outcomes are skin-appearance measures.

Back to the anti-aging evidence overview